MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113117234 · doi:10.1039/c3fd00023k

Carbon nanotube based electrochemical sensor for the sensitive detection of valacyclovir

2013· article· en· W2113117234 on OpenAlexaff
Badal Shah, Todd Lafleur, Aicheng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueFaraday Discussions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential pulse voltammetryCyclic voltammetryElectrochemical gas sensorElectrochemistryElectrodeCarbon nanotubeMaterials scienceReproducibilityDetection limitGlassy carbonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNanotechnologyChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electrochemical sensor for the sensitive detection of valacyclovir has been developed, which is based on single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT)-modified glassy carbon electrodes. The electrochemical oxidation of valacyclovir at the SWCNT-modified glassy carbon electrodes has been investigated using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry. Our experimental results show that the SWCNT-modified glassy carbon electrode possesses high activity toward the electrochemical oxidation of valacyclovir. In a 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4), valacyclovir exhibited an irreversible oxidation peak at -0.91 V. The effects of pH of and the amount of SWCNT deposited on the glassy carbon electrode on the activity of the sensor have also been studied. Under optimized conditions, the sensor demonstrates a linear response range from 5 x 10(-9) to 5.5 x 10(-8) M valacyclovir. The detection and quantification limits were found to be 1.80 x 10(-9) M and 6.02 x 10(-9) M, respectively. The selectivity, stability and reproducibility of the proposed sensor were examined as well. To validate its real world application, the electrochemical sensor has been successfully utilized in the detection of valacyclovir in human blood plasma and pharmaceutical samples. Thus, the electrochemical sensor developed in this study has strong potential to be employed in the quality control testing of pharmaceutical products and also for therapeutic drug monitoring in hospitals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaraday DiscussionsSame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207