Resistance to thiabendazole in Fusarium species and Helminthosporium solani in potato tubers treated commercially in eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 1992-1993 and 1994-1995 winter storage period for potatoes (Solarium tuberosum) in Quebec, New Brunswick, and Prince-Edward-Island, tubers were collected which had symptoms of fusarium tuber rot and silver scurf and which had been treated commercially after harvest with thiabendazole. Resistance to thiabendazole was detected in isolates of Fusarium sambucinum and Helminthosporium solani but not in isolates of F. avenaceum and F. oxysporum. However, the majority of those farms surveyed (64%) had adequate disease control with no pathogen isolated from the diseased tubers. Incidence and EC50 values of resistant isolates were lower than found elsewhere and the occurrence of farms with resistant isolates of F. sambucinum (18%) was greater than for H. solani (7%). For H. solani, EC50 values of resistant isolates were substantially less than those found in Alberta. While the study investigated commercial operations employing a wide range of thiabendazole rates (6-42 g a.i. t-1), no specifie trends were detected between the occurrence of resistant isolates and cultivar or thiabendazole application rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".