MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113125090 · doi:10.1109/tdei.2011.5739451

Density functional theory analysis of the effect of iodine in polyethylene

2011· article· en· W2113125090 on OpenAlexaff
A S Huzayyin, S.A. Boggs, Rampi Ramprasad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyethyleneDensity functional theoryMaterials scienceAtomic orbitalElectronDopingComputational chemistryBand gapChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction between iodine and polyethylene has been studied through the use of density functional theory (DFT) with the purpose of explaining the physical basis behind the increase in the conductivity of polyethylene upon doping with iodine. The interaction between polyethylene and various I <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> stable configurations is characterized in terms of binding energy, bond lengths, electron charge density, changes in electron charge density, and mixing of atomic orbitals, all of which are determined through DFT. Based on the energy of iodine impurity states introduced into the bandgap and the spatial features of the impurity state wavefunctions, a mechanism by which iodine increases the conductivity of polyethylene is proposed. The mechanism explains the experimentally observed increase in hole mobility and decrease of activation energy of polyethylene upon doping with iodine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical InsulationSame topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207