MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113129665 · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02282-2

Quinones in long‐lived <i>clk‐1</i> mutants of <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>

2002· review· en· W2113129665 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroko Miyadera, Kenji Kano, Hideto Miyoshi, Naoaki Ishii, Siegfried Hekimi, Kiyoshi Kita

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCoenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaenorhabditis elegansMutantCoenzyme Q – cytochrome c reductaseElectron transport chainChemistryMitochondrionReactive oxygen speciesLipid peroxidationOxidative stressSuperoxideRadicalAntioxidantBiochemistryOxidative phosphorylationCell biologyBiologyEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ubiquinone (UQ) (coenzyme Q) is a lipophilic redox-active molecule that functions as an electron carrier in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Electron transfer via UQ involves the formation of semiubiquinone radicals, which causes the generation of superoxide radicals upon reaction with oxygen. In the reduced form, UQ functions as a lipid-soluble antioxidant, and protects cells from lipid peroxidation. Thus, UQ is also important as a lipophilic regulator of oxidative stress. Recently, a study on long-lived clk-1 mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrated that biosynthesis of UQ is dramatically altered in mutant mitochondria. Demethoxy ubiquinone (DMQ), that accumulates in clk-1 mutants in place of UQ, may contribute to the extension of life span. Here we elucidate the possible mechanisms of life span extension in clk-1 mutants, with particular emphasis on the electrochemical property of DMQ. Recent findings on the biochemical function of CLK-1 are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicCoenzyme Q10 studies and effectsFrench-language works237,207