MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113134146 · doi:10.3917/tf.122.0151

Des parents co-experts de l'intervention en protection de l'enfant

2012· article· fr· W2113134146 on OpenAlex
Xavier Pitteloud

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThérapie Familiale · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé A partir d’une pratique d’intervenant en protection de l’enfance, l’auteur propose un modèle d’intervention s’engageant dans un processus favorisant la co-expertise parentale. Pour ce faire, il décrira les changements de posture que le professionnel aura à opérer au niveau du cadre et dans la relation qu’il coconstruira avec les parents qu’il rencontre. Pour aller dans ce sens, il décrira deux des outils propres à la thérapie brève centrée sur la solution, modèle de Bruges, que sont l’arbre de décision et le questionnement à partir d’une position de non-savoir. Il traitera aussi de leur adaptation à un contexte de travail social sous mandat. Enfin, il développera les changements de perspective à opérer par le professionnel afin de rendre possible la mise en œuvre d’un tel processus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it