MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113163244 · doi:10.1109/twc.2007.05279

Optimized Distributed Space-Time Filtering

2007· article· en· W2113163244 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Yiu, Robert Schober

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFadingNode (physics)Code division multiple accessSpace–time codeSynchronization (alternating current)Antenna diversityDiversity gainTransmission (telecommunications)Channel (broadcasting)Space-division multiple accessAlgorithmEqualization (audio)ImperfectWirelessComputer networkBase stationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed space-time filtering (DSTF) facilitates node cooperation and achieves a diversity gain while not requiring node coordination, i.e., cooperating nodes do not have to be aware of their partners. This makes DSTF attractive for application in future sensor, ad hoc, and wireless networks. In this paper, we derive a novel cost function and related practical algorithms for optimization of the signature filter vectors (SFVs) used in DSTF. We extend DSTF to frequency-selective fading channels and compare its performance with that of delay diversity transmission with co-located antennas. For the special case of frequency-nonselective channels we show that SFV optimization is closely related to the signature sequence design for code-division multiple access (CDMA) systems and the design of Grassmannian frames. Numerical and simulation results show that the novel SFV designs perform significantly better than previously proposed designs even if non-ideal effects such as suboptimum equalization, imperfect channel estimation, and imperfect timing synchronization are taken into account

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207