Measurements of changes in left ventricular volume, strain, and twist during isovolumic relaxation using MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) active relaxation begins before aortic valve closure and is largely completed during isovolumic relaxation (IVR), before mitral valve opening. During IVR, despite closed mitral and aortic valves, indirect assessments of LV volume have suggested volume increases during this period. The aim of this study is to measure LV volume throughout IVR and to determine the sources of any volume changes. For 10 healthy individuals (26.0 + or - 3.8 yr), magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure time courses of LV volume, principal myocardial strains (circumferential, longitudinal, radial), and LV twist. Mitral leaflet motion was observed using echocardiography. During IVR, LV volume measurements showed an apparent increase of 4.6 + or - 1.5 ml (5.0 + or - 2.0% of the early filling volume change), the LV untwisted by 4.5 + or - 1.9 degrees (36.6 + or - 18.0% of peak systolic twist), and changes in circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strains were +0.87 + or - 0.64%, +0.93 + or - 0.57%, and -1.46 + or - 1.66% (4.2 + or - 3.3%, 5.9 + or - 3.3%, and 5.3 + or - 7.5% of peak systolic strains), respectively. The apparent changes in volume correlated (P < 0.01) with changes in circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strains (r = 0.86, 0.69, and -0.37, respectively) and untwisting (r = 0.83). The closed mitral valve leaflets were observed to descend into the LV throughout IVR in all subjects in apical four- and three-chamber and parasternal long-axis views by 6.0 + or - 3.3, 5.1 + or - 2.4, and 2.1 + or - 5.0 mm, respectively. In conclusion, LV relaxation during IVR is associated with changes in principal strains and untwisting, which are all correlated with an apparent increase in LV volume. Since closed mitral and aortic valves ensure true isovolumic conditions, the apparent volume change likely reflects expansion of the LV myocardium and the inward bowing of the closed mitral leaflets toward the LV interior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".