Observation of Surface/Defect States of SnO<sub>2</sub> Nanowires on Different Substrates from X-ray Excited Optical Luminescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SnO 2 nanowires (NWs) have been successfully synthesized on two different substrates (stainless steel (SS) and copper) via a facile hydrothermal process. SnO 2 NWs with varying degrees of crystallinity are obtained on different substrates. The growth mechanisms are also deducted by observing the morphology revolution at various reaction times. Furthermore, the electronic structures and optical properties have been investigated by X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and X-ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL) measurements. The yellow-green luminescence from SnO 2 NWs is originated from the intrinsic surface states. Compared with SnO 2 NWs on copper, a near infrared (NIR) luminescence is observed for SnO 2 NWs on SS, which resulted from poor crystallinity and an abundance of defect/surface states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".