Fungi associated with cysts of Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida, and Heterodera schachtii; and egg masses and females of Meloidogyne hapla in Belgium
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cysts of Heterodera schachtii from sugar-beet ( Beta vulgaris ) fields and cysts of Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida from potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) fields in northern Belgium, as well as egg masses and females of Meloidogyne hapla from a tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum ) field in the Flemish-Brabant province, Belgium, were collected and examined for the presence of fungi. Of the total of 374 cysts of H. schachtii , 57.7% were colonized by one or more of 18 different species of fungi, all of which were from the genra Acremonium, Chaetomium, Cylindrocarpon, Fusarium, Gliocladium, Humicola, Mariannaea, Nematophthora, Periconia, Phoma , and Verticillium , and 45.3% of the 726 cysts of Globodera spp . were colonized by one or more of 18 different species, from the same gene. Of the 160 egg masses of M. hapla , 32% were colonized by one or more of 18 species of the genra Arthrobotrys , Cylindrocarpon, Fusarium, Monacrosporium, Paecilomyces, Phoma, Plectosphaerella, and Verticillium , while 31% of the 160 females were colonized by 12 species, from the same gene except Paecilomyces and Plectosphaerella . Fusarium oxysporum was by far the predominant species in both the cyst and root-knot nematodes. A black yeast-like fungus was found in cysts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it