Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte est une réflexion critique sur tout le champ de l'intervention psychosociologique, allant du T. Groupe classique aux "nouveaux groupes de thérapie". L'auteur fait d'abord état d'un certain nombre de constantes dans les diverses expériences de groupe. Il discute ensuite plusieurs formes de cloisonnement qui caractérisent la théorie et la pratique des interventions : cloisonnement à l'intérieur de la personnalité elle-même, cloisonnement aussi entre l'individuel et le collectif, entre l'intervention et le système social, entre l'intervention et le système culturel. Il dégage ensuite six modèles d'intervention et indique un certain nombre de voies de recherches sur l'intervention qui ont été peu explorées jusqu'ici. Cet article s'appuie, en particulier, sur des travaux américains et français. Plusieurs des autres textes de ce numéro de Sociologie et Sociétés reprennent l'une ou l'autre des interrogations formulées par l'auteur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.053 | 0.079 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".