MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113286944 · doi:10.3109/13693786.2013.807445

Antioxidative and immunogenic properties of catalase-peroxidase protein in<i>Penicillium marneffei</i>

2013· article· en· W2113286944 on OpenAlexaff
Monsicha Pongpom, Pritsana Sawatdeechaikul, Aksarakorn Kummasook, Sophit Khanthawong, Nongnuch Vanittanakom

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Mycology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersChiang Mai University
KeywordsPenicillium marneffeiCatalaseMicrobiologyPeroxidaseHydrogen peroxideWestern blotBiologyYeastPenicilliumFungusOxidative stressGeneEnzymeBiochemistryVirologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penicillium marneffei is a significant opportunistic fungal pathogen in Southeast Asia and its ability to survive inside the host macrophages is believed to be important in the establishment of infection. Previously, we isolated a gene encoding a catalase- peroxidase (cpeA) from P. marneffei and showed that the cpeA transcript is specifically upregulated during yeast phase growth at 37 °C. In this study, the cpeA transcript was found to be induced during the mycelium to yeast phase transition and during stress conditions induced by hydrogen peroxide treatment. Null mutation of cpeA reduced the fungal tolerance to hydrogen peroxide but not to heat stress. These results indicated that the CpeA plays a crucial role in this fungus' oxidative stress response. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the CpeA induced antibody production in P. marneffei-infected patients, including highly exposed-healthy people. This is the first report that the catalase-peroxidase possesses an immunogenic property in fungi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical MycologySame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207