MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113297849 · doi:10.1109/icc.2009.5198649

A Novel Interactive Streaming Protocol for Image-Based 3D Virtual Environment Navigation

2009· article· en· W2113297849 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Rawan Jarrar, Richard W. Pazzi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanoramaComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)Computer graphics (images)Computer visionImage-based modeling and renderingKey (lock)Artificial intelligencePixelProtocol (science)Computer graphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image-based rendering (IBR) has attracted recent attention mainly due to its low requirements for generating new scenes based on a sequence of reference images. IBR has paved the way for a new class of application, the free viewpoint television (FTV), which allows the viewer to interactively control the camera and move freely within a scene. IBR can also be used to render complex 3D virtual environments on graphics-constrained devices, such as cellphones and PDAs. In this paper, we propose a new protocol that offers the user a richer virtual experience by pre-streaming the necessary imagery data to generate new views as the user wanders within a 3D environment. We introduce the idea of key partial panoramas, Le., panorama segments that cover movements in any direction by simply strafing from an appropriate key partial panorama and streaming the amount of lost pixels. We have implemented our protocols and evaluated them against two well-known approaches. Experimental results show that our solution outperforms the selected approaches, by minimizing the delay between image updates and by allowing for a more complex navigation scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207