MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113335084 · doi:10.1093/jrs/feu032

Introduction: Understanding Global Refugee Policy

2014· article· en· W2113335084 on OpenAlexaff
James Milner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Refugee Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePolitical scienceJurisdictionDisplaced personPublic administrationSyrian refugeesForced migrationEconomic growthLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Researchers visiting the Headquarters of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Geneva will frequently encounter discussions about efforts to develop ‘global refugee policy’. These efforts may relate to changes to existing UNHCR programmes, such as its approach to refugees in urban areas, or to new areas of activity, such as the organization’s response to displacement resulting from natural disasters. These efforts become ‘refugee policy’ when they result in a formal statement of a problem relating to protection, solutions or assistance for refugees or other populations of concern to the global refugee regime and a proposed course of action to respond to that problem. According to Soroos (1990: 318), this policy is ‘global’ when it takes the form of ‘either regulations that define the limits of permissible behavior for national governments and those under their jurisdiction or, alternatively, as programs administered by international agencies,’ such as UNHCR. UNHCR, states and NGOs invest considerable time and resources to develop, adopt and implement global refugee policy. Since 2007, for example, UNHCR has adopted new policies on: age, gender and diversity (UNHCR 2011); statelessness (UNHCR 2010); protection and solutions in urban areas (UNHCR 2009a); displacement resulting from natural disasters (UNHCR 2009b); return and reintegration (UNHCR 2008); and internal displacement (UNHCR 2007). This is in addition to Conclusions adopted by UNHCR’s Executive Committee (ExCom) on refugees with disabilities (2010), protracted refugee situations (2009) and refugee children at risk (2007), all of which constitute global refugee policy. Other notable examples of global refugee policy include the 2002 Agenda for Protection and UNHCR’s policies on older refugees (2000), refugee children (1993) and refugee women (1990). In this way, global refugee policy is a discernible area of activity for the global refugee regime. This activity results in a particular product, namely the document that formally details a given policy, such as those listed above. More generally, however, global refugee policy may also be understood as a process through which particular issues or problems compete for prominence on the agenda of the global refugee regime’s decision-making bodies, where the interests of different actors affect decisions on responses to these issues, and where a range of factors condition efforts to implement these decisions in various regional, national and local contexts. As argued in this introduction, this understanding of global refugee policy as a product and as a process allows for a more rigorous and systematic engagement with this area of ongoing activity within the global refugee regime. Although Refugee Studies has long been concerned with the elements and implications of policies relating to refugees and other displaced persons, our understanding of the process that leads to these policies at the global level, and factors affecting implementation at the local level, is surprisingly limited. While considerable literature exists on the process by which policies are developed at the national or regional levels (such as Guild 2006; Jacobsen 1996), there is very limited literature on the factors that affect the policy-making process at the global level and the impact this policy has on the lives of refugees. While a range of authors have examined the origins, evolution and politics of the global refugee regime (such as Barnett 2002; Loescher 2001), this literature has not systematically engaged with the process by which global refugee policy is made and the factors that affect its implementation. The result is an important gap in the literature, especially given the prominence of policy discussions, the time and resources they require, and their implicit claim to have a positive impact on conditions for refugees and other forced migrants. In response to this gap, the Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, devoted its 30th Anniversary Conference in December 2012 to the theme ‘Understanding Global Refugee Policy’. The conference, which attracted more than 70 participants, provided important insights on various aspects of global refugee policy, both through the 65 papers presented and through the background paper and literature review prepared for the conference (Bauman and Miller 2012; Miller 2012). In addition, the conference was preceded by a day-long workshop entitled ‘The making, methods and movement of global refugee policy.’ Supported by funding from the Refugee Research Network,1 the workshop included 10 papers that considered either the policy-making process within UNHCR or the relationship between global refugee policy and policy responses in specific regional or national contexts. The articles in this special issue draw primarily from papers first presented at this workshop. Articles for the special issue were selected for their ability to help unpack particular analytical and methodological questions relating to the study of global refugee policy. Miller’s review essay engages with the study of global public policy, with its tendency to be process-focused, issue-driven and norm-oriented, to provide a set of conceptual tools to help define and study global refugee policy. Fresia builds from an examination of the negotiation of the 2007 ExCom Conclusion on Refugee Children at Risk to illustrate the process by which policy agendas are set and how the interests of actors involved affect the formulation of global refugee policy. Landau and Amit draw on the case of South Africa to argue that, as refugees are and local protection are by global refugee policy and more by other urban policies and to the to the of the study and of refugee policy. on the case of refugees in to the factors that the limited impact of global policy on solutions for protracted refugee situations in a particular national the of and policies as an of policy from the formal decision-making of the global refugee regime and the that international refugee as an of global refugee policy, has in the implementation of these the relationship between global refugee policy and the policy-making process at the regional the case of the how the interests of actors the policy-making also how UNHCR and the these articles to an understanding of global refugee policy, how global refugee policy is is involved with the global refugee policy how the impact of global refugee policy may be and how global refugee policy other policy that impact of concern to the global refugee regime. The articles also provide examples of different to the study of global refugee policy and how various may be for in this they argue for a more and systematic study of global refugee policy to the process by which it is and and the impact it has on the of those it to The articles also the of especially efforts to or implement global policy in regional, national or local they that a more systematic and rigorous understanding of the global refugee policy process may to more of policy to conditions for refugees and other forced migrants. This from the articles in this special the of the 30th Anniversary Conference and the workshop to a new approach to understanding and global refugee policy. builds from an understanding that ‘global refugee policy’ that it is from other areas of policy, and that it be the of this the first of the a of ‘global refugee policy’ and a more of of the the a conceptual for understanding global refugee policy both as a and a it of the and methodological questions by the study of global refugee policy various for the study of global refugee policy. it for on global refugee refugee policy’ is a formal statement and proposed course of action in response a problem relating to protection, solutions or assistance for refugees or other populations of concern to the global refugee regime. is and within UNHCR’s such as the Executive Committee and or the which constitute the decision-making of the global refugee regime. from the of Soroos (1990: 318), this policy is ‘global’ when it takes the form of ‘either regulations that define the limits of permissible behavior for national through international or ExCom or programs administered by international agencies,’ UNHCR. This is and on those policies from within the global refugee as to a range of other global policy that may affect refugees also on formal as a more discernible form of policy, as to policies that may result from either within the global refugee regime or through policy that the global refugee regime. This is not to argue that other of refugee policy are not made or not at the global this is to a particular area of activity within the global refugee regime. As argued in this introduction, it is important for Refugee Studies to develop a more rigorous and systematic understanding of these as they the time and resources of UNHCR and NGOs and particular both relating to their and that global refugee policy have a positive impact on the lives of refugees and other forced the As in the to this special however, both the and impact of global refugee policy to be more This of global refugee policy builds from the literature on global public policy, as by Miller in to this special and the policy As argued by Soroos (1990: global policy is understood to be by a namely set of that be with In response to such and have argued that within the be understood to have been made when the result is a formal of and which states and international to the of particular and example, UNHCR’s policy on protection and solutions for refugees in urban areas (UNHCR details both the that will UNHCR’s response to the of refugees in urban areas and the specific UNHCR to to protection and is also important to that the the global refugee regime are limited to those affecting have an international for of or to of the have the of the of UNHCR’s to include for other those displaced by or natural is important for the study of global refugee policy to this and as its of policies that are developed to of forced not refugees. As ‘refugee policy’ be understood to be a formal statement of a problem relating to protection, solutions or assistance for refugees or other populations of concern to the global refugee and a proposed course of action to respond to that problem. the of the ‘global’ both to the at which it is namely within global and the of where its implementation is to be example, a review of Conclusions adopted by UNHCR’s Executive Committee between and how Conclusions on from to include formal of a policy problem and specific that be to that those to particular of the In this way, Executive Committee Conclusions may be examples of global refugee policy they include the of a policy a statement of about how the particular problem be and specific that be to the example, the ExCom Conclusion on Refugee the of refugees as a specific states that protracted refugee situations be and details a range of that be by UNHCR, states and other actors to this and Loescher global refugee policy the engagement of different of These are primarily states and UNHCR, may also include NGOs and other of the and This builds from understanding of the of in the UN that and in the they are not the international UNHCR, have to a more in of the policy as NGOs have on the policy in efforts to an issue on the policy agenda and in to existing policies and In the case of the global refugee NGOs are also to the implementation of policy as or of UNHCR More generally, to this special issue also how and have a ability to affect various of the global refugee policy In to these however, it is important to be of more of how they are and how they states not as actors when policy. Soroos that of states to in in which international policy-making takes and that the of these be with the tendency of to form as by more of the of international an that UN in a that the interests of the states that Barnett and illustrate how an international such as UNHCR, may its through policy it is important to how decisions in global not a process or the of the regime. that are of where the interests of more actors may the of or the very of the regime These are especially important when the various involved in making, and global refugee is the ‘global refugee policy As the study of global refugee policy has to on the of policy and on the process that to the of a particular policy or the factors that its implementation. As by the to this special however, there are important analytical and that from engagement with global refugee policy not as a product also as a an understanding from of the public policy process more As by and the of policy-making existing as a set of a for understanding the policy process and to of the and that be examined in study of the is understood to be the process by which various compete for the of policy and the process of policy this process may be of the ongoing of bodies, such as UNHCR’s Executive Committee and its of In and how for new issues to the policy agenda may also be by new about existing issues or to policy that to and policy These and policy particular for new issues to be to the policy agenda in response to the of an policy as by of the case of in this special As in the from Fresia and in this special the in the policy process a in the process that also a particular for actors to within the policy process by that issues of to are included on the agenda or that policy problems are in a that is with their In a range of factors and interests condition the course in response to a particular example, how the interests of a limited of actors may both policy problems and particular in the formulation of policy. These factors about the of in the policy process and about as by a policy problem has been and to the there is a process of where a range of and responses to the problem are proposed and considered by policy international international are primarily for policy for by formal decision-making example, UNHCR policy for by its Executive Committee that this is also the where there is a particular for by and as of or that have the to the policy process by such have been to in the policy formulation of the global refugee policy were to to the Global to the 2002 Agenda for especially through in on issues from and and More generally, however, it is important to more and for engaged with global refugee policy to the policy formulation as a on the various policy policy is through a is at this that a particular of a given policy is either within a formal decision-making or by UNHCR While this in the global refugee policy process be when ExCom to a particular Conclusion the decision-making in be more or example, on the decision-making process within UNHCR’s Executive Committee and that the process of and decision-making on the of a given ExCom Conclusion the by ExCom its as the when the of a given policy the decision-making in the global refugee policy process to be more how decisions are made to adopt other of global refugee policy. the in policy’ in on issues such as urban natural disasters and internal important questions about the decision-making process within UNHCR The of global refugee policy is the is to adopt a formal statement of a problem relating to protection, solutions or assistance for refugees or other populations of concern to the global refugee and a proposed course of action to respond to that problem. The study of global refugee policy as a product include a of these The decision-making however, the of the policy leads to the The implementation is the where global refugee policy the global level and with at the regional, national and local As by the of Landau and and this is where global refugee policy a set of that condition its in its These are with issues of implementation of other of global policy. Soroos that of global policy are that for the problems they These however, the of for policy which will have impact In addition to these however, the to this special issue how the implementation of global refugee policy engagement not with regional, national and local with their interests and also with a range of issue As by the from Landau and for example, the implementation of a global refugee policy on refugees in urban areas engagement with a range of other interests and policies that are also in urban contexts. In this way, that the policies for refugees are not refugee how efforts to implement a global policy on solutions for protracted refugee situations in were by changes in the of for refugees and other displaced are by a range of other policy and the global refugee with for refugees by interests and actors that are not within the range of factors that affect the implementation of global refugee policy, there is for on this of the policy especially that in the implementation of the global refugee policy in different local contexts. either in of actors or the of global refugee policy to other for the study of global refugee policy and the global refugee regime. not have analytical in understanding the of global refugee policy also its in on its implicit of conditions for the As argued by the that implementation be they be that a more systematic and understanding of the range of interests that condition policy implementation a to through which to and those While is made in the of the implementation of may be through of to implement global refugee policy. our understanding of the factors that or the implementation of global refugee policy in national and local may be by on implementation. example, and that new of within a or and there may be in the implementation of the international global the regional and local levels and within different help this they of that may either or constitute implementation efforts by particular these include and on global refugee policy their of these and and their to in the implementation of a particular of global refugee policy in different national and local contexts. As however, in the implementation of global refugee policy also be of the that such policies are the global refugee and in where they may with other policy or The of the policy process is when results of the policies are to the of policy problems and solutions in of and The policy process of global refugee policy has been with the of UNHCR’s and In to UNHCR’s Executive Committee in of the range of by the the These included both of UNHCR’s response to particular and of the implementation of particular policies in specific the also how of UNHCR’s to the of the policy on age, gender and diversity Since UNHCR has on policies from the of to the and of UNHCR’s internal and given the that the interests of international may in the of its and may the and by UNHCR’s in global refugee policy. however, been on the by NGOs and in the of global refugee policy, and how these have to the of particular example, how and of UNHCR’s policies on refugee women to policy changes the examination of the changes in UNHCR’s urban refugee policy between and the important by NGOs in the of the policy and for the formulation and implementation of a new policy. this may also be the of on for refugees in urban areas and the of the policy a of and have of elements of UNHCR’s protection and from NGOs and of the and to the these actors in the global refugee policy more rigorous understanding of this both a area of and an to how these actors may this more While this of the of the global refugee policy process may help how global refugee policy be understood as both a product and a to this special issue also the of understanding the of global refugee policy and other policy how global refugee policy in a on the of policy and developed at the national level or through of be refugee policy. a of how UNHCR on global refugee policy, ExCom the Agenda for Protection and the to for particular of the of refugee protection through the evolution of the articles illustrate how global refugee policy may also be understood as a that policy the global refugee regime. important insights for the study and of global refugee policy, and global public policy more the global refugee regime is understood to in or with other global and the of this may be or in its for the of the global refugee regime global refugee policy may provide an for understanding where and how these These of may include other global such as the and also include efforts to at a regional level, as by More generally, however, that these of may not be limited to formally which include international and formal decision-making how states are through more to new of through and on global refugee policy from this approach to develop a understanding of the relationship between global refugee policy and these policy global refugee policy as a product and a process the of more engagement with global refugee policy. As a time and resources are devoted to discussions on global refugee policy. the of UNHCR’s ability to a or states and and of the process of global refugee policy may UNHCR with an to this more the by the however, in of both and important questions be of process that resources from in protection, assistance and solutions for the more systematic understanding of the process and of global refugee policy that these resources are in the This understanding of the global refugee policy process however, be as a of global refugee policy or a of its and it is to to the of global refugee policy and the at which it be understood and This of the process also the to how issues of and are at of its Miller and may be more the study of global refugee policy. are by the level of concern about the between refugee and refugee policy, and the for to be and not by the policy process the of this special issue and the papers presented at the 30th Anniversary conference all the of more systematic and study of global refugee policy, they also a of and methodological questions about such study in the As on global refugee policy may be by the prominence of policy discussions, the time and resources they their and their claim to have a positive impact on conditions for refugees and other populations of concern to the global refugee regime. to these implicit of and more on global refugee policy. these allows for a examination of global refugee policy that that such policy in with the making, and of global refugee policy allows for a understanding of the range of and that condition both the product and the of policy however, to be by a to policy it to protection and solutions for the As argued by for situations of not have the of as an of the this to the and of and that their are more to than the of those they to The to this special issue that there are at of global refugee policy, with a range of methodological tools and that in this global refugee policy may be as a the formal policy document are specific examples of global refugee policy are the actors that the agenda and are decisions are these decisions by the interests and of various both formally within the decision-making process and those the formal a of how an approach help of these Fresia was not to the of the process that in the of a specific of global refugee policy, also to develop and within the decision-making to While Fresia how such an approach important methodological questions about the of the within the it in other of the of global refugee policy. global refugee policy may be as a While the of the global refugee policy with the of global refugee policy, policy as a process a on the and impact of global refugee policy it has been the of global refugee policy from formulation to are the factors that affect the implementation of global refugee there in the implementation of particular examples of global refugee policy in different this and this about the and of global refugee global refugee policy in in different and policy areas, to other regional, national and local by Landau and and all examples of how these questions may be Landau and Amit draw on the results of and in Africa to the impact of global policy on refugees in urban process and to the impact of global policy on protracted refugee situations in the of solutions for refugees in of and allows for an understanding of the relationship between global refugee policy and the of policy of process and the when global refugee policy and the course of the a regional policy process in the these the range of that help and the various of the global refugee policy especially the of implementation and the of of particular the of case and the from and in particular on the implementation of global refugee policy may also from the methodological from the study of implementation more example, and that in implementation will in process and and that this will with in to the through which international at national and local This in the of and especially to and issues of and the and of the In this way, and the of to the study of where the insights of may the insights of As by the to this on global refugee policy The of this has been to draw on the to the special issue and discussions at the 30th Anniversary Conference to an understanding of the of global refugee policy and how it may be as a product and a on the of the special the has also to the to the study of global refugee policy and the questions that the articles argue for a more and systematic study of global refugee policy. While the for in this area may be by a to more with the implicit of global refugee policy, may also be by the that a more systematic and rigorous understanding of the global refugee policy process to more of policy to protection, assistance and solutions for refugees and other populations of concern to the global refugee regime. the of on global refugee policy, the workshop at the Refugee Studies in December 2012 for the of a of on various aspects of global refugee policy. by the Refugee Research the will on various aspects of global refugee policy, the of in this discussions on methodological and analytical and a of and on the making, and of global refugee policy. of the of the will be to develop methodological to the study of global refugee policy that may be more and their results example, the between the implementation of the global refugee policy in different contexts. In this way, will the results of to be more and more systematically to and about global refugee policy. The may also on new to and provide on particular aspects of global refugee policy. of the Global Refugee and to in the will be on the by The of the global refugee regime is with examples of global refugee policy. The process of and these policies has time and resources of various actors within the global refugee regime. that they are adopted through the formal decision-making of the global refugee they implicit about their and their ability to conditions for refugees and the displaced the As by the to this special however, this and impact is from is that the and may to a understanding of the process by which global refugee policy is made and the factors that affect its ability to protection and solutions for also that the and of this area of activity within the global refugee regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0090.017
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Refugee StudiesSame topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207