Isolation and characterization of a chromium‐reducing bacterium from a chromated copper arsenate‐contaminated site
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Gram-negative bacterium (CRB5) was isolated from a chromium-contaminated site that was capable of reducing hexavalent chromium to an insoluble precipitate, thereby removing this toxic chromium species from solution. Analysis of the 16S rRNA from the isolate revealed that it was a pseudomonad with high similarity to Pseudomaonas synxantha. CRB5 was tolerant to high concentrations of chromate (500 mg l(-1)) and can reduce Cr(VI) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. It also exhibited a broad range of reduction efficiencies under minimal nutrient conditions at temperatures between 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C and at pH levels from 4 to 9. As reduction increased, so did total cellular protein, indicating that cell growth was a requirement for reduction. Under low nutrient conditions with CRB5 or when using non-sterile contaminated groundwater from the site, reduction of Cr(VI) was followed by a increase in solution turbidity as a result of the formation of fine-grained Cr(III) precipitates, most probably chromium hydroxide mineral phases such as Cr(OH)3. Chromium adsorption and precipitation, as observed by transmission electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (TEM/EDS), revealed that the surfaces of the cells were uniformly stained with bound Cr(III) and amorphous precipitates (as determined by selected area electron diffraction; SAED). A mass balance of chromium in a batch bioreactor revealed that up to 30% of the total Cr was as settable precipitates or bound to cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it