MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113362371 · doi:10.1109/aps.2011.5996807

Microwave breast imaging: Time-domain experiments on tissue phantoms

2011· article· en· W2113362371 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Porter, Adam Santorelli, Mark Coates, Milica Popović

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowave imagingBreast tissueBiomedical engineeringMicrowaveMaterials scienceTime domainBreast tumorWidebandBreast cancerComputer scienceOpticsMedicinePhysicsCancerComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents measurements performed with our time-domain system for microwave breast imaging. We demonstrate that, in the time-domain, skin does not decrease the tumor detection ability as compared to phantoms without skin. In fact, in certain cases a skin layer is shown to increase tumor response. The experimental set-up uses ultra-wideband antennas and tissue phantoms with electrical properties approximating those of actual tissue. Tumor detection experiments are conducted on two types of breast phantoms - simple ones containing only fat and malignant tissue, and more realistic ones, incorporating a thin layer of skin, fat and tumor, along with a matching medium between the skin and the antennas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207