MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113396577 · doi:10.1149/1.2435696

Interaction of Aqueous Iodine Species with Ag[sub 2]O∕Ag Surfaces

2007· article· en· W2113396577 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Zhang, S. J. Stewart, David W. Shoesmith, J.C. Wren

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodic stripping voltammetryIodideChemistryAqueous solutionDrop (telecommunication)IodineStripping (fiber)Cathodic protectionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryVoltage dropChemical reactionElectrochemistryElectrodePhysical chemistryMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)ChromatographyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemical conversion of films on Ag surfaces to in aqueous iodide solutions has been studied electrochemically. films were grown potentiostatically and then exposed to solutions. The chemical conversion process was followed at open-circuit potential using cathodic stripping voltammetry performed after various exposure periods. The showed a sudden drop at the completion of the conversion of to , reaching a steady-state value close to the equilibrium potential for and the iodide solution. This sudden drop in allowed easy determination of the total reaction time required for complete conversion of to . Distinctly separated current peaks were observed for the cathodic reduction of and to Ag, and the charges associated with these peaks provided a measure of the amount of converted. The conversion reaction was 100% efficient. The total reaction times from the measurements and the cathodic stripping results were used to determine the reaction order and rate constant required for the development of nuclear reactor safety assessment codes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207