Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a wide array of poor health outcomes. Nonetheless, some low-SES individuals maintain good physical health despite facing recurrent, severe adversities in life. This article describes a “shift-and-persist” model that explains why that is. The model states that in the midst of adversity, some low-SES children find role models who teach them to trust others, to better regulate their emotions, and to focus on their futures. Over a lifetime, these low-SES individuals may develop an approach to life that prioritizes shifting (accepting stress for what it is and adapting oneself to it) in combination with persisting (enduring life challenges by holding on to meaning and optimism). This combination of shifting and persisting strategies mitigates physiological responses to the barrage of stressors confronted by low-SES individuals and forestalls pathogenic sequelae that lead to chronic disease. Identifying health-relevant protective qualities that naturally occur in some low-SES individuals represents one important approach for improving the health of those who confront a lifetime of disadvantages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".