MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113436542 · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2000.886108

Mutual coupling and scattering effects on cellular CDMA systems using smart antennas

2002· article· en· W2113436542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart antennaBase stationMultipath propagationAntenna (radio)BeamformingElectronic engineeringCoupling (piping)Computer scienceAntenna arrayCode division multiple accessScatteringCellular radioDirectional antennaTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsOpticsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that CDMA systems which employ digital beamforming and base station antenna arrays potentially have significantly increased capacity. Therefore, methods are required to accurately predict the performance of these systems. One such method evaluates the system performance by studying the electromagnetic behavior of the base station antenna array. Unfortunately, in most studies using this method the effects of mutual coupling in closely-spaced array elements as well as scattering due to multipath propagation are not considered, thus leading to potentially less accurate system performance predictions. The development of an improved method where the effects of both mutual coupling and scattering are included in the system capacity predictions are presented and applied to system performance prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207