Effect of timing of application and population dynamics on the degree of biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by bacterial antagonists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antagonistic Pseudomonas spp. (DF-41 and PA-23) were evaluated for inhibition of germination of ascospores, and for the effect of timing of application and its effect on biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, causal agent of stem rot of canola. Population dynamics were also assessed. In all studies, a petal inoculation technique was used. Significant inhibition (P < 0.05) of germination of ascospores was observed at both log 4 and log 8 cfu (colony forming units) ml(-1) of bacterial populations. In the population study, the pathogen had no significant effect (P < 0.05) on bacterial populations; however, a significant (P < 0.05) increase in bacterial populations was observed after 24 h and a decrease occurred between 96 and 120 h. Significant differences in disease severity (P < 0.05) were found with respect to timing of ascospore applications in the control treatments (ascospores only). One isolate completely suppressed disease when co-applied with ascospores, while only minor suppression occurred when applied 24 or 48 h after. Results from all studies indicate PA-23 and DF-41 to be effective biocontrol agents against S. sclerotiorum of canola and to have practical implications for biological control of this disease by bacteria in the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".