MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113457476 · doi:10.1002/app.12268

Biaxial orientation behavior of polystyrene: Orientation and properties

2003· article· en· W2113457476 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaomin Zhang, Abdellah Ajji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthElongationBirefringenceShrinkagePolystyreneToughnessExtrusionStress (linguistics)Transverse planePolymerOpticsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Square sheets of extrusion grade polystyrene (PS) were biaxially stretched using a laboratory biaxial stretcher. The effects of process parameters such as stretch ratio, drawing sequence, drawing speed, and temperature were studied. Birefringence, mechanical properties, and thermal shrinkage of the stretched sheets were the focus of this study. A high orientation was achieved at high stretch ratio, and orientations from uniaxial to equi‐biaxial were obtained by controlling the relative magnitude of stretch ratio in machine (MD) and transverse (TD) directions. Stretching increased tensile strength and elongation at break significantly, which indicated an improvement in the toughness of the oriented PS sheets. Those properties were correlated with biaxial orientation factors: a rapid increase was observed for both tensile strength and elongation at break for birefringence levels above −0.005, and below, a plateau was observed. The shrinkage strain and stress were found to correlate well with the biaxial orientation factors. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 487–496, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207