MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113528966 · doi:10.1142/s0218195900000061

ORTHOGONAL EDGE VISIBILITY GRAPHS OF POLYGONS WITH HOLES

2000· article· en· W2113528966 on OpenAlexaff
G. Srinivasaraghavan, Asish Mukhopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibility graphMathematicsBipartite graphCombinatoricsVisibilityPolygon (computer graphics)Planar graphEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGraphVisibility polygonPolygon coveringDiscrete mathematicsGeometryRegular polygonComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceOpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we report on a set of six necessary conditions that must be satisfied by the edge visibility graph of an orthogonal polygon with holes. We have also proved the following significant result: If G is a connected, bipartite, planar, and irreducible (in a sense defined in the paper) graph then it can be realized (that is, there is a corresponding orthogonal polygon with holes) up to leaf addition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computational Geometry & ApplicationsSame topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207