MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113539939 · doi:10.1287/moor.1090.0411

Bid-Price Controls for Network Revenue Management: Martingale Characterization of Optimal Bid Prices

2009· article· en· W2113539939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMartingale (probability theory)Bid priceMathematicsRevenueRevenue managementEconometricsMathematical economicsMathematical optimizationEconomicsFinanceApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a continuous-time, rate-based model of network revenue management. Under mild assumptions, we construct a simple ε-optimal bid-price control, which can be viewed as a perturbation of a bid-price control in the classical sense [Williamson, E. L. 1992. Airline network seat control. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA]. We show that the associated bid-price process forms a martingale and the corresponding booking controls converge in an appropriate sense to an optimal control as ε tends to 0. Moreover, we show that there exists an optimal generalized bid-price control, where the bid-price process forms a martingale and is used in conjunction with a capacity usage limit process. We also discuss its connection to the bid-price controls in the classical sense and sufficient conditions for the (near) optimality of the latter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it