MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113560484 · doi:10.1109/pesw.2002.985101

Mitigation of AC arc furnace voltage flicker using the unified power quality conditioner

2003· article· en· W2113560484 on OpenAlexaff
A. Elnady, Walid El‐Khattam, M.M.A. Salama

Bibliographic record

Venue2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlickerVoltageElectric arc furnacePower qualityCompensation (psychology)EngineeringPower (physics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringControl (management)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of deregulation policy in the power sector has emphasized the need for new tools, which are capable of tracking and mitigating the voltage disturbances caused by nonlinear loads. This paper introduces a new strategy to track and mitigate the voltage flicker and the unbalance produced by large AC arc furnaces. The mitigation strategy depends on an innovative technique for voltage disturbance extraction, which uses symmetrical components. This paper proves that The unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) is capable of suppressing the entire voltage disturbance in the industrial system. Results of digital simulation are presented to validate and verify the control strategy and to assess the performance of UPQC to mitigate the voltage flicker and the unbalance produced by AC arc furnace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309)Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207