Borinic Acids: A Neglected Class of Organoboron Compounds for Recognition of Diols in Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Association constants between diphenylborinic acid and representative analytes capable of reversible two-point covalent binding (diols, catechols, and hydroxy acids) were determined using an indicator-displacement assay. Unlike boronic acids, which have been studied in great detail as receptors for diols and related compounds, borinic acids have effectively been ignored as candidates for such applications. The results of this study indicate that diphenylborinic acid displays high affinity for certain analytes of this type in aqueous solution. Of particular interest are differences between the selectivity of the borinic acid and that of a boronic acid of similar pKa towards the series of analytes studied: the borinic acid displays an unusually high level of discrimination for catechols over carbohydrates. The distinct selectivity observed, and the unique opportunities for steric and electronic tuning of diarylborinic acids, suggest that these compounds hold significant potential for applications in aqueous-phase molecular recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".