MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113562980 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2006.1660151

Enhanced Non-Intrusive Speech Quality Measurement Using Degradation Models

2006· article· en· W2113562980 on OpenAlexaff
Tiago H. Falk, Wai-Yip Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultiplicative functionSpeech codingMaximizationMeasure (data warehouse)Distortion (music)Degradation (telecommunications)Robustness (evolution)AlgorithmCoding (social sciences)Speech recognitionComputational complexity theoryMutual informationLinear predictive codingExpectation–maximization algorithmArtificial intelligenceData miningMaximum likelihoodMathematical optimizationMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The speech quality estimation scheme in [1] is improved with the addition of a reference model of the behavior of speech degraded by different transmission and/or coding schemes. Moreover, via maximization of a mutual information measure, we validate the use of segmental SNR as a measure of the amount of multiplicative noise present in the test signal. These two additions result in an algorithm that is more accurate and more robust to certain distortion conditions. When tested on unseen data, the proposed algorithm outperforms the current "state-of- art" P.563 algorithm while requiring considerably lower computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207