Effects of Glycemic Regulation on Chronic Postischemia Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injuries consist of enhanced oxidative and inflammatory responses along with microvascular dysfunction after prolonged ischemia and reperfusion. Because I/R injuries induce chronic postischemia pain (CPIP) in laboratory animals, it is possible that surgical procedures using prolonged ischemia may result in chronic postoperative pain. Glycemic modulation during ischemia and reperfusion could affect pain after I/R injury because glucose triggers oxidative, inflammatory, and thrombotic reactions, whereas insulin has antioxidative, antiinflammatory, and vasodilatory properties. METHODS: One hundred ten rats underwent a 3-h period of ischemia followed by reperfusion to produce CPIP. Rats with CPIP had previously been divided into six groups with differing glycemic modulation paradigms: normal feeding; fasting; fasting with normal saline administration; fasting with dextrose administration; normal feeding with insulin administration; and normal feeding with insulin and dextrose administration. Blood glucose concentration was assessed during I/R in these separate groups of rats, and these rats were tested for mechanical and cold allodynia over the 21 days afterward (on days 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 21 after I/R injury). RESULTS: I/R injury in rats with normoglycemia or relative hyperglycemia (normal feeding and fasting with dextrose administration groups) led to significant mechanical and cold allodynia; conversely, relative hypoglycemia associated with insulin treatment or fasting (fasting, fasting with normal saline administration, and normal feeding with insulin administration groups) reduced allodynia induced by I/R injury. Importantly, insulin treatment did not reduce allodynia when administered to fed rats given dextrose (normal feeding with dextrose and insulin administration group). CONCLUSION: Study results suggest that glucose levels at the time of I/R injury significantly modulate postinjury pain thresholds in rats with CPIP. Strict glycemic control during I/R injury significantly reduces CPIP and, conversely, hyperglycemia significantly enhances it, which could have potential clinical applications especially in the surgical field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".