Changes in cross‐sectional geometry of the distal femoral metaphysis associated with inflammatory arthritis are reduced by a bisphosphonate (zoledronate)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An increased risk of fracture is a feature of rheumatoid arthritis and of animal models of inflammatory arthritis. We examined geometrical changes in the metaphyseal cortex of the distal femur in an animal model of inflammatory arthritis. Additionally, we examined the effect of a bisphosphonate in preventing these changes. Five groups of rabbits were studied: normal controls, those with inflammatory arthritis, and three groups with arthritis treated with bisphosphonate. To determine geometrical properties, image analysis was performed on digitized cross sections of the femoral metaphyseal cortices. The results demonstrated that the posterior cortical wall was significantly less thick in rabbits with arthritis than in normal rabbits and in the rabbits in the three bisphosphonate treatment groups (p < 0.05). Moment of inertia about the lateral-medial axis was reduced in rabbits with arthritis compared with normal rabbits (p < 0.05). Cross-sectional area was not significantly different between groups. The changes suggest a mechanism of weakening of bone in arthritis; when the results are coupled with results of previous porosity studies, severe directional weakness is apparent. Bisphosphonate was effective in preserving bone integrity in inflammatory arthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".