Capacités métalinguistiques d’élèves immigrants nouvellement arrivés en situation de grand retard scolaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche visant à tracer le portrait d’une clientèle peu connue, celle des élèves immigrants nouvellement arrivés au Québec en situation de grand retard scolaire. Les résultats indiquent principalement que ces élèves rencontrent des difficultés à considérer la langue comme un objet de réflexion et de manipulation intentionnelle. Après environ 13 mois de scolarisation, leurs capacités métalinguistiques sont clairement moins développées que celles de leurs pairs réguliers ; leurs performances en décodage et en compréhension restent faibles après deux ans d’intégration à l’école. Des pistes d’intervention sont suggérées, notamment l’utilisation de la langue maternelle de l’élève ou des activités de sensibilisation à la diversité langagière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".