Rhodium-Catalyzed Methylenation of Aldehydes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rhodium-catalyzed methylenation of aldehydes using trimethylsilyldiazomethane and triphenylphosphine produces a variety of terminal alkenes in excellent yields. These mild and nonbasic reaction conditions allow the conversion of enolizable substrates (keto aldehydes and nonracemic alpha-substituted aldehydes) to terminal alkenes without epimerization. Optimization of the reaction conditions led to the conclusion that a variety of rhodium(I) sources can be used as catalysts. The effect of the solvent on the reaction has also been studied, and it indicates that although the THF is the best solvent, other solvents may be used. The reactivity of the system is very much dependent on the nature of the phosphine reagent. The use of an easily removable phosphine is also described. Spectroscopic studies indicate that the reaction proceeds via an unusual mechanism which leads to the in situ formation of the salt-free phosphorus ylide, methylenetriphenylphosphorane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it