Bibliographic record
Abstract
La dynamique de la cure oscille entre faire advenir la fonctionnalité réciproque des processus primaire et secondaire et révéler un contenu inconscient. Le rêve est le témoin de cette dialectique et apparaît pour l’auteur comme un mode d’expression de transferts multiples. C’est le travail autour du rêve d’une patiente en analyse qui illustrera ce point de vue. Pourront être repérés le transfert déformé des désirs et souvenirs inconscients dans le champ de la conscience et les transferts sur l’objet analyste qui peuvent être pluriels. Ces transferts reflètent l’actualisation du passé et de l’infantile mais aussi la structure de l’élaboration pulsionnelle dans son lien aux objets. Enfin, sera suggéré le transfert figuré du degré d’appropriation de la fonction analytique. Histoire infantile, histoire de la cure et structure trouvent ainsi à se représenter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".