MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113675596 · doi:10.1093/imamci/dnm012

Resilient feedback stabilization of discrete-time systems with delays

2007· article· en· W2113675596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBounding overwatchControl theory (sociology)Linear matrix inequalityDiscrete time and continuous timeBounded functionComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Formalism (music)Full state feedbackMathematicsMathematical optimizationControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A class of linear, uncertain discrete-time systems with state delay is considered. We develop an linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based analysis and redesign procedures for improved robust stability of discrete-time systems with state delay and bounded nonlinearities. Then, we address the robust stabilization using nominal and resilient feedback designs. In both cases, the trade-off between the size of the controller gains and the bounding factors is illuminated and incorporated into the design formalism. Seeking computational convenience, all the developed results are cast in the format of LMIs and several numerical examples are presented throughout the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it