MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113780904 · doi:10.2118/08-08-18-tb

Oil and Gas Securities Regulation and Reporting: National Instrument 51-101

2008· article· en· W2113780904 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Elliot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIssuerBusinessAccountingLegislationPetroleum industryCarry (investment)FinanceFossil fuelLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The prime assets of an oil and gas company are its reserves and resources; they are the most important information about a company, and are the basis on which capital is raised to carry out its activities. A reporting issuer is a company that sells securities on the open market, but not necessarily on an exchange. Canadian National Instrument 51–101 (NI 51–101) governs the disclosure that is required of a reporting issuer. It has been in force since September 2003 and mandates the disclosure of Proved and Probable reserves and allows the disclosure of other categories of resources by reporting issuers. This paper provides a background to the securities regulation and regulatory reporting regime of NI 51–101, including recent amendments. It is not a substitute for the expert advice that should be sought by anyone attempting to fulfill securities regulatory requirements. Some trends and issues on oil and gas reserves and resource estimation and disclosure in Canada and the international arena are also discussed. Introduction The ability to raise money in the public market, to start or continue the activities of a company, carries with it a responsibility to report on these activities to investors. Reporting or "disclosure" requirements are prescribed by securities regulators and apply to all such companies. Because of the importance to the Canadian economy of the extractive industries, oil and gas and mining companies are required to provide additional information beyond that generally required. For the oil and gas industry, new securities legislation, National Instrument 51–101, Standards of Disclosure of Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51–101), was implemented in 2003, replacing the previous legislation, National Policy 2B. Some recent amendments, mainly a reduction in reporting requirements, came into force in December 2007. The Alberta Securities Commission has been administering NI 51–101 since its inception. NI 51–101 reporting is only one of the many reporting requirements that a company is required to fulfill. A brief overview of securities regulation is given here to provide a context for NI 51–101 reporting within the general framework of securities regulation. This is not a substitute for the expert advice that should be sought by anyone attempting to fulfill securities regulatory requirements. The Canadian Oil and Gas Securities Market The Canadian oil and gas securities market is one of the largest of its kind in the world, and about 50% of the world's public oil and gas companies are listed on TSX/TSXV. The number of listed oil and gas companies on the TSX website as of December 31, 2007 was:Canadian TSX/TSXV 424US (NYSE, AMEX, NasDaq) 183LSE-AIM 140A number of reporting issuers trade on other venues than the TSX/TSXV, and an estimated 538 reporting issuers are currently expected to make NI 51–101 annual filings in 2008. Securities Regulation Purpose Securities regulators are responsible for the administration of securities laws in Canada, which includes: Developing, implementing and maintaining securities laws and policies.Regulating primary and secondary market trading through the closed system.Enforcement of securities laws.Educating and communicating with stakeholders and the public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.086
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.086
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0130.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207