A Generalized Least Absolute Deviation Method for Parameter Estimation of Autoregressive Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a generalized least absolute deviation (GLAD) method for parameter estimation of autoregressive (AR) signals under non-Gaussian noise environments. The proposed GLAD method can improve the accuracy of the estimation of the conventional least absolute deviation (LAD) method by minimizing a new cost function with parameter variables and noise error variables. Compared with second- and high-order statistical methods, the proposed GLAD method can obtain robustly an optimal AR parameter estimation without requiring the measurement noise to be Gaussian. Moreover, the proposed GLAD method can be implemented by a cooperative neural network (NN) which is shown to converge globally to the optimal AR parameter estimation within a finite time. Simulation results show that the proposed GLAD method can obtain more accurate estimates than several well-known estimation methods in the presence of different noise distributions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it