MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113837114 · doi:10.7332/4441

Water Temperatures in a California Red-legged Frog Breeding Pond

2012· article· en· W2113837114 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Galen B. Rathbun

Bibliographic record

VenueImmediate Science Ecology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesMetamorphosisHabitatTadpole (physics)EcologyAmphibianResource (disambiguation)Environmental scienceBiologyFisheryLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The California Red-legged Frog ( Rana draytonii ) is a threatened species, thus resource managers are faced with maintaining, and even creating, breeding habitat for the frog. The Mediterranean climate regime where the frog occurs can result in breeding site desiccation during the long dry summer, before larval metamorphosis occurs, which can be exacerbated in coastal areas where prevailing cool temperatures might slow tadpole development. Water temperature profiles were logged every three hours for six days at a coastal breeding pond. Despite mid-day maximum air temperatures that averaged about 14 o C, solar radiation produced mid-day shallow-water temperatures approaching 30 o C. These preliminary data hopefully will encourage further research on the topic, but in the meantime will assist resource mangers to better understand frog behavior and existing recommendations for maintaining, improving, and developing frog breeding habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmediate Science EcologySame topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207