MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113844580 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.315

FPGA-Based Lossless Data Compression using Huffman and LZ77 Algorithms

2007· article· en· W2113844580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHuffman codingEncoderLossless compressionField-programmable gate arrayData compressionVHDLComputer hardwareApplication-specific integrated circuitEmbedded systemAlgorithmOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lossless data compression algorithms are widely used by data communication systems and data storage systems to reduce the amount of data transferred and stored. GZIP is a popular, patent-free compression program that delivers good compression ratios. This paper presents hardware implementations for the LZ77 encoders and Huffman encoders that form the basis for a full hardware implementation of a GZIP encoder. The designs have been implemented as state machines in VHDL in such a way that they are suitable for implementation using either FPGA or ASIC technologies. Performance metrics and resource utilization results obtained for a prototype implementation running on an Altera DE2 board are presented. Ultimately, the goal is to utilized the LZ77 encoders and Huffman encoders described in this paper to build a fully-functional, hardware design for a GZIP encoder that could be used in data communication systems and data storage systems to boost overall system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207