Prostaglandin H Synthase 2 Expression in Airway Cells from Patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Products of the prostaglandin H synthase (PGHS) metabolic pathway are thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma. We determined the level of expression of the constitutive (PGHS-1) and inducible (PGHS-2) isoforms of the enzyme in induced sputum and bronchial biopsies of patients with asthma, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and unaffected control subjects by immunocyto- and immunohistochemistry. Immunoreactivity for PGHS-2 was significantly greater in the induced sputum of patients with asthma and patients with COPD compared with unaffected control subjects. The level of PGHS-2 was greater in asthma than in COPD. Immunoreactivity for PGHS-1 increased in cells in the induced sputum of patients with asthma and patients with COPD compared with that of unaffected control subjects. Immunostained cells included macrophages, eosinophils, and neutrophils. Greater PGHS-2 immunoreactivity was seen in the submucosal inflammatory infiltrate and in the airway epithelium of patients with asthma compared with unaffected control subjects. In summary, we demonstrate an induction of PGHS-2 in asthma, suggesting increased formation of prostanoids, which may contribute to the inflammatory process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".