Mixtures-of-Experts of Autoregressive Time Series: Asymptotic Normality and Model Specification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a class of nonlinear models based on mixtures of local autoregressive time series. At any given time point, we have a certain number of linear models, denoted as experts, where the vector of covariates may include lags of the dependent variable. Additionally, we assume the existence of a latent multinomial variable, whose distribution depends on the same covariates as the experts, that determines which linear process is observed. This structure, denoted as mixture-of-experts (ME), is considerably flexible in modeling the conditional mean function, as shown by Jiang and Tanner. In this paper, we present a formal treatment of conditions to guarantee the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), under stationarity and nonstationarity, and under correct model specification and model misspecification. The performance of common model selection criteria in selecting the number of experts is explored via Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, we present applications to simulated and real data sets, to illustrate the ability of the proposed structure to model not only the conditional mean, but also the whole conditional density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.066 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".