Preparation and characterization of biodegradable agar/poly(butylene adipate‐ <i>co</i> ‐terephatalate) composites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of biocomposites were developed by reinforcing agar particles from red marine plant Gelidium robustum into poly(butylene adipate‐ co ‐terephatalate) (PBAT) using extrusion and injection molding technique. The effect of different content of agar (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt%) on the physico‐mechanical properties of the biocomposite was evaluated. The dynamic mechanical behavior of the composites was studied to determine the storage and loss modulus. The incorporation of agar particles into PBAT enhanced the tensile strength and modulus with a reduced percentage of elongation at break. A reduction in the mechanical loss factor (tan δ) was noticed with the addition of agar particles into PBAT. A reverse trend was noticed for storage and loss modulus. The thermogravimetric analysis revealed that the degradation temperature of PBAT‐agar composites lies in between that of their individual components (agar and PBAT). An increase in melting ( T m ) and crystallization ( T c ) temperature of the biocomposites were noticed as agar particle content increased. The rheological study carried out by dynamic frequency experiments demonstrated that viscosity is increased with the presence of agar particles. The morphology of the biocomposites was analyzed using scanning electron microscope. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it