MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113902953 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2004.838633

Premium Quality Power Park Based on Multi-Terminal HVDC

2005· article· en· W2113902953 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)ConvertersElectric power systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringTransmission systemHigh-voltage direct currentPower qualityVoltage sourceHVDC converter stationPower (physics)Electric power transmissionInsulated-gate bipolar transistorTransmission (telecommunications)VoltageElectronic engineeringDirect currentTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subtransmission and distribution systems in large cities are often served by underground cable systems. Because of the compactness and the reduced cost of dc cable transmission lines, a Multi-Terminal HVDC system based on IGBT Voltage Source Converters (VSCs) can be an attractive alternative to an ac cable system. This paper draws attention to the added value which comes from the capability of Multi-Terminal HVDC (VSC-M-HVDC) system to ensure uninterrupted quality power to sensitive loads. The value of Premium Quality Power Park obtainable from a VSC-M-HVDC system should enhance its attractiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it