MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113907962 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2006.40

A New Polarimetric CFAR Ship Detection System

2006· article· en· W2113907962 on OpenAlexaff
Ting Liu, Γεώργιος Λαμπρόπουλος

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsAUG Signals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstant false alarm rateClutterDetectorPolarimetryComputer sciencePrincipal component analysisArtificial intelligenceObject detectionRobust principal component analysisPattern recognition (psychology)False alarmBlock (permutation group theory)Computer visionRemote sensingRadarMathematicsGeologyPhysicsTelecommunicationsOpticsScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the proposed work is to develop optimal polarimetric Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) detector for ship detection. Polarimetric transformations and decompositions, clutter analysis, modeling, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and multi-CFAR detection are the necessary components of optimal polarimetric CFAR ship detectors. The resulting CFAR detector outperforms the conventional polarimetric CFAR detector by providing higher probability of detection. Optimal polarimetric CFAR detection procedures are proposed in this report. Given the simulated polarimetric RADARSAT-2 data, different polarimetric transformations and decompositions are applied. The resulting images will be transmitted to an adaptive Principal Component Analysis (PCA) block. Through the adaptive PCA block, the image of the first principal component which has the highest SNR among all the images (including the original, transformed/decomposed images, and the images after the adaptive PCA) will be used for ship detection. Optimal multi-CFAR detection will be applied to this image and then the final decision will be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207