MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113958730 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.288

A Simple, Two-Level Markovian Traffic Model for IPTV Video Sources

2008· article· en· W2113958730 on OpenAlexaff
Fengdan Wan, Lin Cai, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIPTVComputer scienceReal-time computingMarkov processMarkov chainQueueFrame (networking)Computer networkVariable bitrateGroup of picturesAlgorithmBit rateDecoding methodsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To facilitate network performance analysis and simulations for IPTV traffic, a two-level Markovian traffic model is proposed in the paper. The model considers both spatial and temporal correlation in MPEG encoded video sequences, so it can mimic the highly variable data rate (VBR) behavior of IPTV sources. The model contains a Group of Pictures (GoP)- level Markov chain and a frame-level Markov chain, so it can capture both the inter-GoP and intra-GoP correlations. The proposed traffic model is simple to incorporate into network simulators, and can be used to obtain closed-form solutions of queue performance. Extensive simulations have been conducted to compare the network performance using the proposed model with the performance of a variety of real video traces. The results show that the accuracy of the proposed video source model is sufficient for the study of network performance. Therefore, it is an effective tool for performance evaluation of IPTV services via analysis and/or simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207