MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113971016 · doi:10.3109/15563650.2010.492350

Fomepizole fails to prevent progression of acidosis in 2-butoxyethanol and ethanol coingestion

2010· article· en· W2113971016 on OpenAlexaff
Tawny Hung, Christopher R. DeWitt, W. Martz, William E. Schreiber, Daniel T. Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Toxicology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolic acidosisMedicineAnesthesiaAcidosisAntidoteLactic acidosisDialysisEthanolIngestionAlcohol dehydrogenaseToxicitySurgeryInternal medicineBiochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: 2-butoxyethanol (2BE) is a solvent commonly incorporated into household and industrial cleaning products. Its ingestion causes rapid central nervous system depression, hypotension, and metabolic acidosis attributable to metabolism of the parent compound to butoxyacetic acid (BAA) by alcohol dehydrogenase. Lactic acidosis is also reported to develop in some cases. Published treatment strategies include the use of ethanol infusion, ethanol with concomitant dialysis, dialysis alone, and fomepizole. CASE REPORT: We present an unusual case of a coingestion of ethanol and 150-250 mL of pure 2BE, which resulted in rapid obtundation, severe airway edema, hypotension, and prolonged acidosis despite the coingestion of ethanol and the administration of a loading dose of fomepizole. Continuous veno-venous hemodialysis was employed to treat the acidosis. Ingestion was confirmed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometric determinaiton of 2BE and BAA. The patient recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSION: Alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors may not be adequate to prevent acidosis in significant ingestions to 2BE and extracorporeal treatments may be necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ToxicologySame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207