MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113988257 · doi:10.1139/t09-047

Studies on soil contamination due to used motor oil and its remediation

2009· article· en· W2113988257 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sanjay Kumar Singh, R. K. Srivastava, Siby John

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental remediationContaminationSoil waterMotor oilHuman decontaminationSoil contaminationEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringSoil testSoil scienceEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental chemistryGeologyWaste managementChemistryEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental program was undertaken to evaluate the changes in behaviour of soils due to interaction with used motor oil (U.M.O) followed by their remediation. Different types of soils classified as clay with low plasticity (CL), clay with high plasticity (CH), and poorly graded sand (SP) were used for the study. Laboratory studies were conducted on virgin (uncontaminated) soil samples and soil samples simulated to varying degrees of contamination (i.e., 3%, 6%, and 9% by dry weight of soil) to compare the geotechnical properties before and after contamination. The engineering properties altered due to contamination. Surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)) enhanced washing was employed to decontaminate the soils. It was observed that the original geotechnical properties of soils could be almost restored (variation ranging from 0 to 12%) upon decontamination with SDS at an optimum dosage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207