MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2113992972 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.43.5.1643

THE STRUCTURE OF LITHIUM-CONTAINING SILICATE AND GERMANATE GLASSES

2005· article· en· W2113992972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGermanateSilicateLithium (medication)Silicate glassMineralogyMaterials scienceGeologyChemistryGeochemistryInorganic chemistryCrystallographyIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'addition d'oxydes d'alcalins a la composition d'un verre silicate cause la disruption de la trame siliceuse et la formation d'atomes d'oxygene non chevauchants, rattaches a seulement un atome de Si, et donc des especes Q n . Les compositions de verre siliceux lithiniferes se comportent differemment des verres contenant un autre alcalin. L'addition de Li 2 O aux compositions a base de silicate et de germanate genere des groupes Q 2 a faible teneur en Li. De plus, la formation preferentielle d'un tel groupe est encore plus marquee pour les compositions a base de germanate que pour celles a base de silicate. Nous preconisons un mecanisme impliquant la liaison du Li a une paire d'atomes d'oxygene non chevauchants, faisant donc partie de groupes adjacents de tetraedres Q 2 , assurant ainsi une coordinence quatre du Li, dans un agencement planaire carre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it