L’empowerment et intervention familiale : concept paradoxal occultant parfois la pauvreté
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les compressions budgétaires dans les services sociaux, d’éducation et d’appuis à la famille sont omniprésentes. À l’hiver 1996, le gouvernement Harris annonçait une restructurationéventuelle des services de santé mentale à l’enfance fondée sur l’efficience ciblée. On mise surune intervention précoce, brève, intensive et efficace. L’empowerment des individus et desfamilles semble une voie à explorer. Cet article vise à cerner cette notion et ses divers courants,puis à l’appliquer à l’intervention familiale individualisée selon une perspective écologique.Sans en faire une analyse approfondie, nous saisirons au départ les énoncés ministériels parrapport à la pauvreté et au travail avec les familles. L’empowerment occulte-t-il alors unesur-responsabilisation individuelle des problèmes? Banaliser ce concept permet-il de nier lapauvreté et son impact sur des familles?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".