MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Motivação à prática regular de atividade física: um estudo exploratório

2011· article· pt· W2114078492 on OpenAlexaff
Marcos Alencar Abaíde Balbinotti, Marcus Levi Lopes Barbosa, Carlos Adelar Abaide Balbinotti, Ricardo Pedrozo Saldanha

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudos de Psicologia (Natal) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A motivação na perspectiva da Teoria da Autodeterminação (TAD) sugere que uma pessoa pode ser motivada em diferentes níveis. Neste estudo essas diferenças são exploradas através de comparações dos níveis gerais de motivação, observando-se as variáveis "sexo e faixa etária". Uma amostra de 635 praticantes de ambos os sexos e com idades variando de 18 a 55 anos respondeu o "Inventário de Motivação à Prática Regular de Atividade Física e Esportiva" (IMPRAFE-126). Os resultados indicam haver diferença significativa (F(2, 632) = 7,214; p = 0,001) somente quando controlada a faixa etária. As diferenças foram interpretadas conforme preconiza a TAD e com relação aos estados e tarefas do desenvolvimento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudos de Psicologia (Natal)Same topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207