La polyphonie dans le roman haïtien contemporain : regards croisés, dédoublés, occultés
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Confrontés au vécu dictatorial, les romanciers haïtiens ont progressivement substitué aux constructions de l’Indigénisme et du réalisme social de Jacques Roumain et de Jacques Stephen Alexis, une narration profondément liée à l’écriture de l’occulte et au sentiment schizophrénique qui frappe le sujet littéraire haïtien. La notion bakhtinienne de « polyphonie » est désormais fréquemment appliquée à des romans dont la structure entrecroise plusieurs narrations à la première personne. La question du point de vue se pose tant au sens perceptif qu’au sens argumentatif. De fait, le dialogisme renvoie aussi à l’inscription du discours de l’autre dans son propre discours. Dans l’intertextualité des citations et des topoï indigénistes, les figures du zombie et du double marassa permettent d’opposer une polyphonie véritablement subversive, qui dialogise les règles de la mimésis, à une polyphonie prétexte, facilement réductible à un discours univoque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".