MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114155823 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2005.847052

Compact MMIC CPW and asymmetric CPS branch-line couplers and Wilkinson dividers using shunt and series stub loading

2005· article· en· W2114155823 on OpenAlexaff
Khelifa Hettak, G.A. Morin, M.G. Stubbs

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStub (electronics)Coplanar waveguideStriplineMonolithic microwave integrated circuitTransformerInductorElectrical impedancePower dividers and directional couplersElectrical engineeringShunt (medical)PhysicsEngineeringMicrowaveVoltageTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circuit size may be reduced by up to 60% by embedding series and shunt uniplanar stubs inside the main uniplanar line since this reuses physical space in the longitudinal direction. This size-efficient stub loading of the main uniplanar line results in robust options for designing compact K-band 90/spl deg/ hybrid couplers and Wilkinson dividers. The approach is confirmed by experimental results that agree well with theory up to at least 30 GHz using both coplanar waveguide (CPW) and asymmetric coplanar stripline (ACPS). Furthermore, these couplers and dividers do not use lumped inductors or capacitors and, consequently, have excellent design accuracy even at millimeter-wave frequencies. Additionally, it is shown that it is possible to design an ACPS 90/spl deg/ branch-line coupler without the conventional CPW quarter wavelength transformers used to match the input and output port characteristic impedances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207