MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114167355 · doi:10.1002/syn.20867

In vitro and in vivo comparison of [<sup>3</sup>H](+)‐PHNO and [<sup>3</sup>H]raclopride binding to rat striatum and lobes 9 and 10 of the cerebellum: A method to distinguish dopamine D<sub>3</sub>from D<sub>2</sub>receptor sites: A method to distinguish dopamine D<sub>3</sub>from D<sub>2</sub>receptor sites

2010· article· en· W2114167355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSynapse · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
KeywordsRacloprideStriatumChemistryDopamineIn vivoBiophysicsPharmacologyBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro binding characteristics of the dopamine D₃/D₂ antagonist [³H]raclopride were compared to the D₃/D₂ agonist [³H](+)-PHNO in membrane preparations from rat striatum, cerebellum Lobules 9 and 10 (CB L9,10), and other cerebellar regions. In striatum, both radioligands labeled a single binding site. [³H](+)-PHNO showed higher affinity, though lower B(max) , compared with [³H]raclopride and was sensitive to inhibition by Gpp(NH)p. [³H](+)-PHNO showed significant specific binding to CB L9,10 membranes with higher affinity compared to striatal membranes. [³H](+)-PHNO binds to a high- and a low-affinity binding site in CB L9,10 membranes; the high-affinity site was not Gpp(NH)p-sensitive. [³H](+)-PHNO did not significantly bind cerebellum left hemisphere membranes. Very low specific binding of [³H]raclopride was found in CB L9,10. The selective dopamine D₃ antagonist SB-277011 did not displace the binding of either ligand to striatal membranes but potently inhibited the binding of [³H](+)-PHNO in CB L9,10 membranes. The highly selective D₂ antagonist SV-156 showed the opposite profile. In vivo experiments were consistent with and supported by in vitro results. In summary, [³H](+)-PHNO and [³H]raclopride mainly label dopamine D₂ receptors in rat striatum, with [³H](+)-PHNO labeling a D₂(High) population. In vitro and in vivo, [³H](+)-PHNO labels CB L9,10 dopamine D₃ receptors that are apparently in a high affinity state whereas [³H]raclopride gave only very low signal in this region. The present approaches appear useful for selectively labeling dopamine D₃ and D₂ receptors in different rat brain regions and offer the possibility to demonstrate D₃ versus D₂ receptor selectivity of compounds using native rat brain tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it