MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2114167355 · doi:10.1002/syn.20867

In vitro and in vivo comparison of [<sup>3</sup>H](+)‐PHNO and [<sup>3</sup>H]raclopride binding to rat striatum and lobes 9 and 10 of the cerebellum: A method to distinguish dopamine D<sub>3</sub>from D<sub>2</sub>receptor sites: A method to distinguish dopamine D<sub>3</sub>from D<sub>2</sub>receptor sites

2010· article· en· W2114167355 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Béla Kiss, Ferenc Horti, Amrita Bobok

Bibliographic record

VenueSynapse · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
KeywordsRacloprideStriatumChemistryDopamineIn vivoBiophysicsPharmacologyBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro binding characteristics of the dopamine D₃/D₂ antagonist [³H]raclopride were compared to the D₃/D₂ agonist [³H](+)-PHNO in membrane preparations from rat striatum, cerebellum Lobules 9 and 10 (CB L9,10), and other cerebellar regions. In striatum, both radioligands labeled a single binding site. [³H](+)-PHNO showed higher affinity, though lower B(max) , compared with [³H]raclopride and was sensitive to inhibition by Gpp(NH)p. [³H](+)-PHNO showed significant specific binding to CB L9,10 membranes with higher affinity compared to striatal membranes. [³H](+)-PHNO binds to a high- and a low-affinity binding site in CB L9,10 membranes; the high-affinity site was not Gpp(NH)p-sensitive. [³H](+)-PHNO did not significantly bind cerebellum left hemisphere membranes. Very low specific binding of [³H]raclopride was found in CB L9,10. The selective dopamine D₃ antagonist SB-277011 did not displace the binding of either ligand to striatal membranes but potently inhibited the binding of [³H](+)-PHNO in CB L9,10 membranes. The highly selective D₂ antagonist SV-156 showed the opposite profile. In vivo experiments were consistent with and supported by in vitro results. In summary, [³H](+)-PHNO and [³H]raclopride mainly label dopamine D₂ receptors in rat striatum, with [³H](+)-PHNO labeling a D₂(High) population. In vitro and in vivo, [³H](+)-PHNO labels CB L9,10 dopamine D₃ receptors that are apparently in a high affinity state whereas [³H]raclopride gave only very low signal in this region. The present approaches appear useful for selectively labeling dopamine D₃ and D₂ receptors in different rat brain regions and offer the possibility to demonstrate D₃ versus D₂ receptor selectivity of compounds using native rat brain tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynapseSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207