Learning appearance and transparency manifolds of occluded objects in layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By mapping a set of input images to points in a low-dimensional manifold or subspace, it is possible to efficiently account for a small number of degrees of freedom. For example, images of a person walking can be mapped to a one-dimensional manifold that measures the phase of the person's gait. However, when the object is moving around the frame and being occluded by other objects, standard manifold modeling techniques (e.g., principal components analysis, factor analysis, locally linear embedding) try to account for global motion and occlusion. We show how factor analysis can be incorporated into a generative model of layered, 2.5-dimensional vision, to jointly locate objects, resolve occlusion ambiguities, and learn models of the appearance manifolds of objects. We demonstrate the algorithm on a video consisting of four occluding objects, two of which are people who are walking, and occlude each other for most of the duration of the video. Whereas standard manifold modeling techniques fail to extract information about the gaits, the layered model successfully extracts a periodic representation of the gait of each person.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".